SMS and Internet Campaigning

The COMELEC has a novel question before it: what to do about SMS and internet campaigning. Without pretending that this will be a comprehensive answer to that question … let me dispose of the easy half of that question first.

Can we do anything about internet campaigning? NO, we cannot.

The problem with the internet is not as simple as watching over public spaces and preventing or penalizing people who put up ads in those spaces. For one thing, we don’t even have that good a definition of what constitutes ‘public space’ on the ‘net. While it may be theoretically possible to regulate the creation of websites (the registration of the domain name and the cost of designing, putting up, and maintaining the website are susceptible to valuation, i.e., we know how much all of that costs) by simply mandating that their cost be part of the spending quota (which, by the way, is now just a theoretical thing), the thing with internet campaigning is that the website itself is not the most crucial element of the campaign. The real value of the site, i.e., how well the site can benefit your candidacy, is in how many other sites link to it and how high up does the site appear on search engine results.

Not to mention the fact that cyberspace is littered with online journals like this one. How can the COMELEC control the content of these blogs without infringing on the bloggers freedom of expression? Just thinking about it gives me a headache. After all, policing the internet is something that escapes even the acknowledged experts all over the world, how can we have better success? All told, I think that we’re still a long way off from being able to effectively regulate the internet as a campaign arena.

SMS may not be much easier.

One of the strengths of SMS as a propaganda tool is that it is cheap, it is anonymous, and it provides a window into nearly 90% of the  population. And the NTC regulations on the matter – NTC MC 03-03-2005 and NTC MC 03-03-2005-A – only deal with bulk messaging systems. It’s a safe bet that political operators will not be using these bulk messaging services – Info-text type things – precisely because those damned things are regulated. Political operators will be sticking to prepaid cards that are practically a dime-a-dozen and set-up their own adhoc ‘text’ brigades.

These text brigades are composed of a core of hard-core believers who receive a template message from their agit-prop maker and just pass it on to everyone in their phonebooks. With a core group of even 10 people, each with an average a hundred contacts in their phonebooks, that ad hoc text brigade can reach, at the cost of one peso (or whatever the going rate for SMS is) , a thousand others. It’s like multi-level-marketing on meth.

Not that I’m giving anyone any funny ideas, but that’s how it is. How can the COMELEC regulate that sort of thing? If anyone has any idea on how it can be done, let us know.  I may be totally against any sort of regulation being slapped on SMS and internet campaigning, but that doesn’t mean the COMELEC will just fall in line behind me.

So, again, you think my ideas are ass-backward, tell me. I’ll appreciate it.


2 Responses

  1. The Comelec control the Internet?
    King Canute had better luck with the Sea!

    There’s nothing new under the sun, James, so if Comelec needs ideas on how to regulate the Internet, or other forms of censoring free expression and communication, it needs to look no further than Red China. Look up stuff like the Great Firewall of China and other forms of censorship commonly employed by the Chinese authorities to control the hearts and minds of their people. (And the countermeasures of the Free Men of the world!)

    But WWW has become a kind of uber-medium that all other Media must use, of necessity. Comelec cannot dick with that without running afoul of the Law and Commerce and certain realities of the world not even our sovereignty can touch.

    It is definitely going to be a challange for Fascists to deal with the Web, because the transactions costs are almost nil, once anyone is connected, and the influence of a single website is nonlinear with respect to the costs of operating it.

    I think Comelec’s real duty is to ensure equal acces to the global resource. Greater freedom for all, not less, is the answer.

    Indeed, least government is the best government, because then, the People must discipline themselves.

    Or we can do it in the Supreme Court. Again.

    By the way Congratulations on your new website…I’ve blogged rolled it on Philippine Commentary.

  2. No, Mr. Bocobo, I don’t think we’ll do it in the Supreme Court. Like I said, the consensus around here is that regulating the internet as a campaign area is a pipe dream.

    The whole ‘regulate-the-internet’ crap didn’t originate from us, by the way. It’s the kind of iggerant swill that some quarters try to make media mileage off of, at the expense of the COMELEC, and it bugs me like a gnat in my eye.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: