Again with the contempt

On the heels of Abalos’ announcement that Lintang Bedol’s motion for reconsideration was denied, Bedol’s lawyer Andrei Tagum took a page from Bedol’s play book and showed his contempt for the Commission:

Tagum admitted that they were “half-expecting” the Comelec to junk their motion for reconsideration.

“If we go by the history of the commission, I don’t think they have ever reversed their decision because that would be an admission that they erred.  There’s no other remedy for us with the Comelec so we might go to the Supreme Court,” he maintained. 

When a quasi-judicial body declines to reverse its decision on a motion for reconsideration, it is because the arguments in the motion do not justify reversal, or because the motion failed to present any new arguments, i.e., different from – or perhaps better than – those that led to the original adverse decision.

It strikes me as being extremely arrogant for defeated lawyers to claim that the tribunal before which they are arguing is composed of petty men who would rather perpetuate an injustice than to admit their error.  Arrogant and sophomoric.

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: